Politics for good

Poliomyelitis is an infectious disease with consequences ranging from a mild illness, through lifetime disability to death. The disease is also known as polio. It is spread by contamination of drinking water and food and those affected may be contagious for up to six weeks without being aware of their illness. Once you have polio, there is no cure – treatment is based on assisting sufferers to live with the condition.

In 1988, around 350,000 additional people were infected with polio across the world. In 2016, the grand total was under 50. Most of us would be aware that disease infection rates usually don’t ‘drop off a cliff’ like polio apparently has, so the obvious question is why?

There is a vaccine that is proven effective against the disease, however it requires multiple doses and some discipline in the administration to be completely effective. If you lived through the 1960’s through to the early 2000’s in Australia, you might remember being given a small plastic spoonful of a syrup on a few occasions when you were lined up for vaccine injections. The syrup was the Sabin polio vaccine, and was replaced by one of the parts of an injection given to babies in 2005.

Australia and other wealthy countries can afford to fund immunisation programs with beneficial results, others can’t and it probably wouldn’t be a surprise to find that the less than 50 newly reported cases in 2016 were in countries that have other massive issues to solve, namely Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. While the World Health Organisation declared the south west Pacific free of polio in 2000, there is a risk of the disease being reintroduced to Australia from travellers bringing polio into the country with them. Accordingly, the vaccine is still administered today.

It might surprise you to know that the worldwide service organisation, Rotary, is one of the prime funders of efforts to eliminate polio in our lifetime and their program commenced in 1979
When James L. Bomar Jr., then Rotary president, put the first drops of vaccine into a child's mouth, he ceremonially launched the Philippine poliomyelitis immunization effort. Bomar joined Enrique M. Garcia, the country's minister of health, in signing the contract committing Rotary International and the government of the Philippines to a joint five-year effort to immunize around 6 million children against polio at a cost of about $760,000.

In a 1993 interview, Bomar recalled how the brother of one of the children he'd immunized tugged on his pant leg to get his attention and said, "Thank you, thank you, Rotary."
There is a cost to attempting to eradicate polio from the earth and it is
estimated at US$1 billion dollars every year. While Rotary’s contributions make up a substantial portion of the yearly global polio eradication budget (and exceed the contributions of most individual G20 nations), Rotary’s advocacy has been even more influential, resulting in in more than US$7.8 billion to date in polio-specific grants from the public sector and consolidation of a partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that will see the foundation commit a further US$1.8 billion in coming years. Rotary envisages that its own contributions to the global polio eradication effort will exceed US$1.2 billion by the time the world is certified polio-free.

Of course that’s not to mention the countless hours and resources Rotarian volunteers worldwide devote every year to ending polio, both by fundraising in local communities and working internationally at the coal-face providing oral vaccinations to children. Simply put, Rotary remains one of the easiest channels through which everyday people can get involved in fighting polio, a fight which will be won by vaccinating one child at a time.

But the costs pale in comparison to the substantial dividends that a polio-free world would gain. Financial savings from the forgone costs of treating polio could exceed $1 billion per year, while a 2010 study published in leading medical journal Vaccine estimated the economic benefits of halting polio to amount to US$40-50 billion.
By attempting to eliminate polio, Rotary are demonstrating they exist to help fix what they perceive to be the unmet needs in their communities, as do Lions by funding research to eliminate cancer, Apex Australia by supporting Guide Dogs for the Blind, CWA, Surf Livesaving, Scouts, Guides, St John Ambulance and a host of other community organisations.

All of these organisations are experts in recycling money to achieve their aims. This is where the politics for good comes in.

When you grab a sausage from Bunnings, buy the ticket in the raffle for a trailer load of garden equipment, donate to the lifesavers rattling a tin at the transport interchange or shopping centre, get the Christmas Cake or attend the Gympie Music Muster (a fundraiser for the Gympie Apex Club), you directly support the community services that the individual club is supporting. It could be erecting rubbish bins in the local park, patrolling the beaches to ensure safety, assisting a local child to access educational opportunities, funding respite accommodation at hospitals or eliminating polio.

There is obviously a structure to the individual service clubs and they all belong to a hierarchy, which helps with club administration, financial and physical protection for the club members (who are inevitably volunteering their time and other material) and a method of connection between like-minded people in different towns, states and (in the case of Rotary and Lions at least), nations.

So how do they decide what they will recycle the money on?

When Rotary President James L. Bomar Jr. gave the first dose of polio vaccine in the Philippines in 1979, it wasn’t because he woke up one morning with a great idea and decided to implement it with $760,000 of other people’s money that he had temporary control of. What would have happened is that club members in a Rotary Club somewhere in the world would have noted that polio was a destressing condition and killing or permanently disabling hundreds of thousands per annum across the world. That person would have discussed it with his (in the 1970’s Rotary was male only) Rotary Club, and successfully argued that the concept be referred to the clubs in the district.

Once the district had approved it, it would have gone to the next level and so on until it received support from the Rotary International Convention. Along the way, the concept for the elimination of polio would have changed from an idea to a fully blown business case with costings, implementation programs and expected benefits just as if it was a business – because in reality it is. There would have been a number of lobbying efforts by those in favour of the proposal to ensure a majority of the delegates to the International Convention saw the merit of the scheme.

Then after implementation, the actual results would be assessed and changes made, just as any corporation would, to retain product relevancy. This would have been referred back to the Rotary Clubs for grassroots members to see the worth of their financial and physical contributions to the cause. The good news in this is that service clubs usually don’t want to see people fail, so they will support the club members responsible for the plan and assist with developing strategies to achieve success by helping to write business plans, organise sections of events as well as whatever is necessary to assist the ‘real’ organiser. As the Apex Club of South Toowoomba points out¬
We have a policeman who project manages a statewide fashion show and a publican who runs a multi-layered national organisation.
When there are competing ideas, there is usually politics involved. We don’t know what other concepts were pitched within Rotary around the time that the eradication of polio was supported and who knows, one of them may have had greater worth. However, it is a prime example of someone, somewhere having a plan that is literally improving the quality of life for everyone, then feeling the encouragement to speak up and in turn receiving support for the concept. The concept is now 30 years old and demonstrably effective. Just as effective is funding the erection of rubbish bins or shade sails in the local park; the politics is working out what is the best use of the physical and financial efforts of the individual club members. Rotary Clubs have certainly funded other projects around the world in addition to their ambition to eradicate polio, and what is considered to be useful in one community may not be so in another.

This is grassroots politics, having an idea, convincing others of the worth of the idea and then implementing the idea which has a significant community benefit. Politics is not about Abbott working out how to perform the latest ritual knifing of Turnbull, or if Joyce and the other ‘foreign’ Nationals should have even been elected to Parliament while finger pointing at other parties to deflect blame because the National Party apparently didn’t do any due diligence. These behaviours, along with the ongoing sagas and finger pointing between the LNP, One Nation, NXT, Greens and ALP are just greed and hatred. It’s a pity that we are all paying for the hatred with increased taxes, fuel prices and a lack of co-ordinated genuine activity that would benefit all of us.

There are groups in your community that care enough to make a difference. You have a far greater chance of achieving a result for your community in any of these groups than you would by running as either an independent or political party aligned candidate at the next election, as you have to ‘pay your sponsors back’ in ‘politics’ by conforming to certain behaviours, while service organisations help and assist those with the ideas. You could join the local Lions Club, attend your children’s school Parents & Citizens Committee, volunteer for Meals on Wheels, patrol a beach or help run a group you or a member of your family is already a member of. They would certainly welcome your help, you will learn how politics should work and who knows, you might have the next earth changing idea. If more people know how politics is supposed to work, we as a community can hold those inhabiting the corridors of power in the state and federal capitals to account to a far greater level than is currently done. A lot of them play a greedy and hateful politics with the rest of us solely as a means of self-promotion.

At the very worst if you join a group, you will meet some great people, have a feeling of accomplishment because you are doing something useful, probably learn some useful skills that you never would have thought necessary (like the policeman running the fashion contest for Apex Australia) and wish you had done it years ago.

Disclaimer – The writer is a retired Apexian and a current member of Lions. He has cooked more sausages and stood behind more temporary bars than he chooses to remember.

Rate This Post

Current rating: 0 / 5 | Rated 0 times

Michael Taylor


Interesting post, 2353. It struck a chord with me. 



Thanks Michael,

We tend to concentrate on the all the reasons that politics is a 'winner take all' proposition, rather than separate out the process from the personalities. A lot of personalities in the process are aggressive and angry people who need to learn that they don't have the answer to everything. A perfect example is Matt Canavan during the ABC's Queensland Election telecast last Saturday night.

He couldn't accept that anyone had a different point of view and was rude and arrogant in articulating his views, regardless of the fact that a significant number of Queensland voters for their own good reasons had a different viewpoint and expressed it on the day.

Ad Astra



The Queensland election exemplifies your line of reasoning about the degraded state of contemporary politics. The people of Queensland agree with you, and have indicated in the election results that they are tired of politicians and the way they play politics.

They have rejected One Nation and Pauline Hanson’s brand of politics emphatically. Although many voted for One Nation, I suspect as a protest against the politics of the major parties, far from her prediction that she would win ten seats and have the balance of power, she will be fortunate to win even one. She has lost many of her team; Malcolm Roberts never made it beyond the starting gate. She has only rubbish left.

The LNP push fell far short, struggling to the finishing line well short of Labor. The weight in its saddlebag of the Newman legacy was too much. At least Tim Nicholls had the good sense to concede that the LNP lost convincingly.

But federal politicians can’t or won’t see that the Queensland vote was not only local, it was also a commentary on the state of federal politics.

We saw Matt Canavan in denial on Saturday evening, and by Sunday Malcolm Turnbull was out in full Pontius Pilate mode insisting that the election was fought solely on state issues. Someone as smart as Turnbull can’t believe that; he is simply doing his usual dissembling, hoping some will believe him. Of course some of his sycophants will, but a deeply sceptical electorate will not.

His problem though is closer to home; his fellow Liberals, and especially the Nationals, see Queensland as yet another Turnbull failure, and will use it in their guerrilla fight against him. Tony Abbott will be sharpening his knives.

Politicians live in a bubble that they create to protect themselves against the harsh realities of politics. Some can see out into the world around them. Some can’t. Some won’t. They will perish from lack of the oxygen that reality provides.

Thank you for reminding us that there are other ways of supporting the community and healing its wounds, ways exemplified by the many service clubs, service is the key motivator, not money, not power

Ad Astra



We would appreciate your feedback on the new format of The Political Sword.

Our Webmaster has put many months into rewriting the tens of thousands of lines of to give you the new style and its many features.

Please let us have your opinion via this Comments section.

Ad Astra



For a sound analysis of the Queensland election result, read Michelle Grattan's piece in The ConversationQueensland result, while decided on state issues, adds to Turnbull’s burdens


Ad Astra



For a good belly laugh, read Phil Coorey's piece in the AFR he quotes would-be assassin Tony Abbott: "The era of the political assassin has to end": Tony Abbott.  Read more: http://www.afr.com/news/the-era-of-the-political-assassin-has-to-end-tony-abbott-20171126-gztb4y#ixzz4zbPPrl7b 




That AFR article is paywalled unfortunately.

Ad Astra



Bernard Keane had a sharp analysis of the Queensland election in Crikey today in Turnbull rattled over One Nation's pull on conservatives:


Ad Astra



Here's another sound analysis: Queensland election: how Adani helped undo the LNP's push to regain power. Exit polls in the state’s south-east found up to 70 of respondents were against the billion-dollar rail line loan for Adani.


Ad Astra



In case the Bernard Keane link to Turnbull rattled over One Nation's pull on conservatives: didn't work for you, try this:


Ad Astra



Here is the text of Phil Coorey's article in the AFR: 'The era of the political assassin has to end': Tony Abbott

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has suggested the undermining or replacing Malcolm Turnbull as leader will not solve the Coalition's problems. Mr Abbott, who was replaced by Mr Turnbull in a 2015 coup, has told radio station 2GB that "the era of the political assassin has to end".

"One of the reasons why the public is so turned off politics and politicians generally is they see all of this…and they do get that people are acting dishonourably, that people are behaving badly.

"You might gain a short-term advantage from it if your rival is damaged but the long term damage is to the system as a whole."

The government has had a dreadful run in recent months caused by the citizenship fiasco, bad polls and other disasters, and is now plagued by leaking and speculation. A swing against the Liberal-National Party towards One Nation at the Queensland state election Saturday has resulted in further introspection, with renegade federal LNP MP George Christensen blaming Mr Turnbull's leadership.

Mr Abbott said: "All of this dishonour has got to stop. The era of the political assassin has to end." "We've had it now over the last dismal decade. It's damaged both sides of politics, it's damaged our country and it's got to stop. It must, must stop."

'You don't do it by becoming One Nation lite' Mr Abbott's comments came as others in the Liberal Party hit back at Mr Christensen who used social media on Sunday to apologise to those who felt the need to vote One Nation and blame Mr Turnbull for the Queensland result.

Four out of the five seats which overlap Mr Christensen's seat of Dawson had slight swings to the LNP but still recorded a strong One Nation vote.

Education Minister Simon Birmingham said Mr Christensen's blaming of Mr Turnbull was "ridiculous". He said rather than kowtow to One Nation, Mr Christensen should take the party on and explain to disenfranchised voters why the LNP was a better prospect, and why policies free trade were actually beneficial.

"You don't do it by becoming One Nation lite, you do it by taking the fight up to them," Senator Birmingham told Sky News.

Mr Christensen's fellow Queensland LNP MP Warren Entsch said Mr Christensen was wrong. Rather than grovel, he should explain to voters why they should stick with the LNP.

"What he should be doing is explaining," he told ABC radio. "I don't think that, you know, going out and apologising to one opponent or others, a general apology for, you know, is appropriate.

"He'd be far better off reaching out to his electorate in its total and saying, well rightly-oh, you know, these are the reasons I'm doing this." If he reaches out to one group and says, I'm really, really sorry, we've got to do what is your will, everything you want, I mean, it's just going to disenfranchise another group.

So, I think he's got to, you know, stick to his own principles and do it that way, accommodate needs or, you know, views ver he feels comfor in doing so; and he doesn't, he needs to be able to stand up and explain the reasons behind his, you know, his position."

Mr Entsch reminded Mr Christensen he was part of the government. Attorney-General George Brandis said he could understand Mr Christensen's anxiety given the strong One Nation vote in state seats which overlapped his electorate.

"So I can understand why Mr Christensen is exercised, but what I would remind him is at the end of the day, what the Australian people want is for governments to get on and deliver for them - to deliver on jobs, to deliver on energy prices, to deliver on national security, to deliver on the real things,' he said.

"They won't want to see an endless symposium on Queensland electoral politics."

Mr Abbott agreed Queensland "was largely fought on state issues but I guess you can't entirely rule out some background influences".

"LNP leader Tim Nicholls was doing his best to talk about concrete things, he said we will build a dam, we will build a mine and we will build a coal fired power station of and in the bargain we will cut payroll tax."

T-w-o take away o-n-e equals?